MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Efficient Wide-Power-Range RF Power Harvesting System for Self-Sustainable Wireless Sensor Nodes: IEEE ICMMT 2025

2025· article· en· W4415178578 on OpenAlexaff
Kuo Guan, Lei Guo, Xuwang Li, Yangping Zhao, Ke Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless Networks
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersDepartment of Science and Technology of Liaoning ProvinceState Key Laboratory of Millimeter Waves
KeywordsPower (physics)Energy harvestingCapacitorWirelessWireless sensor networkVoltageNode (physics)Radio frequencyPower control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes an efficient wide-power range radio frequency (RF) power harvester to address the challenge of reduced power conversion efficiency (PCE) in wireless power harvesting systems (WPHS). To manage the variable load conditions introduced by a DC-DC boost converter, a power partitioning network within the power harvester was designed. This network automatically adjusts the power ratio between two branches of the power harvester at different input power levels. As a result, a wide dynamic power range with high PCEs is realized, while showing a stable output voltage of 2.8 V. The proposed power harvester demonstrates a measured PCE larger than 70% at 2.45 GHz over an input power range of 2.7-13.3 dBm. It successfully charges a super capacitor to 3.3 V, forming a reliable WPHS with wide dynamic power range. Finally, a totally self-sustainable wireless sensor node based on this system has been demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy Harvesting in Wireless NetworksFrench-language works237,207