RIS-Assisted XL-MIMO for Near-Field and Far-Field Communications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider a reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS)-assisted extremely large-scale multiple-input multiple-output (XL-MIMO) downlink system, where an XL-MIMO array serves two groups of single-antennas users, namely near-field users (NFUEs) and far-field users (FFUEs). FFUEs are subject to blockage, and their communication is facilitated through the RIS. We consider three precoding schemes at the XL-MIMO array, namely central zero-forcing (CZF), local zero-forcing (LZF) and maximum ratio transmission (MRT). Closed-form expressions for the spectral efficiency (SE) of all users are derived for MRT precoding, while statistical-form expressions are obtained for CZF and LZF processing. A heuristic visibility region (VR) selection algorithm is also introduced to help reduce the computational complexity of the precoding scheme. Furthermore, we devise a two-stage phase shifts design and power control algorithm to maximize the sum of weighted minimum SE of two groups of users with CZF, LZF and MRT precoding schemes. The simulation results indicate that, when equal priority is given to NFUEs and FFUEs, the proposed design improves the sum of the weighted minimum SE by 31.9%, 37.8%, and 119.2% with CZF, LZF, and MRT, respectively, compared to the case with equal power allocation and random phase shifts design. CZF achieves the best performance, while LZF offers comparable results with lower complexity. When prioritizing NFUEs or FFUEs, LZF achieves strong performance for the prioritized group, whereas CZF ensures balanced performance between NFUEs and FFUEs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".