MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Observer-based MPC Design of an Axial Dispersion Tubular Reactor: Addressing Recycle Delays through Transport PDEs

2025· article· en· W4415180360 on OpenAlexafffund
Behrad Moadeli, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDiscretizationControl theory (sociology)Dispersion (optics)Model predictive controlController (irrigation)Process (computing)Boundary (topology)EstimatorDigital control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The model predictive control of an axial dispersion tubular reactor equipped with a recycle stream is presented. The intrinsic time delay imposed by the recycle stream, an often overlooked aspect in chemical engineering process control studies, is modeled as a transport PDE, leading to a boundary-controlled system of coupled parabolic and hyperbolic PDEs under Danckwerts boundary conditions, suitable for this reactor type. Considering the digital nature of modern controllers, a discrete-time linear model predictive controller is designed to stabilize the system, coupled with a Luenberger state estimator to address the controller’s limited access to the system’s full state. The need for model reduction through spatial approximation is eliminated by following a late lumping approach, while utilizing Cayley-Tustin time discretization method to preserve the continuous-time system’s characteristics. The controller’s effectiveness is demonstrated through numerical simulations, showcasing its capability to stabilize an unstable system while adhering to input constraints, having access merely to output measurements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation→French-language works237,207→