MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415180801 · doi:10.1109/tce.2025.3617466

Stable and Invertible Generic Fourier Descriptors for Shape-Based Image Classification

2025· article· en· W4415180801 on OpenAlexafffund
Youssef Ait Khouya, Abdeslam Jakimi, Abdellah Chehri, Faouzi Ghorbel, Rachid Saadane

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCompleteness (order theory)Property (philosophy)Invariant (physics)Pattern recognition (psychology)Optimal distinctiveness theoryInvertible matrixFourier transformContextual image classificationImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increasing consumer demand for smart surveillance devices capable of behavior analysis and danger alerting has led to the utilization of various descriptors for image recognition across applications, independent of image position, orientation, and scale. Despite this, few studies have focused on the completeness property of invariant descriptors for grayscale, color, and three-dimensional images. Completeness ensures descriptor distinctiveness for specific shapes, a property that is challenging to achieve and, at times, has been accessible for planar curves. The recently introduced concept of invariants’ invertibility, associated with completeness, facilitates the reconstruction of an object’s shape through similar transformations. This paper proposes a Stable and Invertible Generic Fourier Descriptor (SIGFD) for gray-level images. We demonstrate the invariance, convergence, and completeness properties of the proposed SIGFD set. To assess its robustness, we conduct experimental evaluations on well-known datasets such as Kimia 99, MPEG-7, and COIL100. Additionally, we utilize our proprietary FSTEF Faces dataset to further evaluate face recognition performance. The effectiveness of the proposed SIGFD sets is evidenced through the various studies presented in this work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Consumer ElectronicsSame topicImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesFrench-language works237,207