MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415188087 · doi:10.35562/rma.1640

Metaphor as a Vehicle for the Resurgence of a Minority Ontology in “A Ship-Shaped Hole in the Forest” by Ellen van Neerven

2025· article· fr· W4415188087 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anne Le Guellec-Minel

Bibliographic record

VenueReprésentations dans le monde anglophone · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicNarrative Theory and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCollege of Pharmacy, University of MichiganUniversity of TorontoUniversity of MichiganUniversity of Minnesota
KeywordsMetaphorPoetryLamentIndigenousOrder (exchange)IconicityOntologyEvent (particle physics)Colonisation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In line with resurgent theories about First Nations peoples (Coulthard, Corntassel), this article shows how Ellen van Neerven’s poetic writing in Throat, specifically in “A Ship-Shaped Hole in the Forest”, does not merely lament the negative impact of colonisation but transforms the negative space hollowed out by the coloniser into a creative resource. The poem succinctly reminds the reader of the existence of an alternative view of the colonising event and voices an alternative ontology. At the same time, the sailing ship, that positive vehicle of British colonisation in Australia Day celebrations, is inverted to represent a historic violation the impact of which reverberates far back into deep time as well as into the present. The final part of the study builds on Paul Ricœur’s discussion of the iconicity that is specific to the poetic metaphor and of the kind of hermeneutic effort it requires of the reader (The Rule of Metaphor), in order to show how the semantic deconstruction/reconstruction process called for by the “ship-shaped” metaphor constitutes a form of heuristic action-writing that is part and parcel of Indigenous resurgence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.977

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReprésentations dans le monde anglophoneSame topicNarrative Theory and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207