MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415197858 · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntaf182

Tackling the “Filter Fraud”: A Call for Policy Action to Address Environmental and Health Harms Caused by Cigarette Filters

2025· article· en· W4415197858 on OpenAlexafffund
Shannon Gravely, K. Michael Cummings, Katherine East, Megan E. Roberts, Roberta Freitas‐Lemos, Loren Kock, Alex C Liber, Christina N Kyriakos, Andrew B Seidenberg, Geoffrey T. Fong, Thomas E. Novotny

Bibliographic record

VenueNicotine & Tobacco Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Cancer InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCancer Research UKSociety for the Study of AddictionOntario Institute for Cancer Research
KeywordsAction (physics)Smoking cessationPublic healthCigarette smokingMEDLINETobacco controlHealth policy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shannon Gravely, PhD, K Michael Cummings, PhD, Katherine A East, PhD, Megan E Roberts, PhD, Roberta Freitas-Lemos, PhD, Loren Kock, PhD, Alex C Liber, PhD,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.049
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.141
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0490.141
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.022
Scholarly communication0.0250.028
Open science0.0070.013
Research integrity0.0770.058
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNicotine & Tobacco ResearchSame topicGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207