Winter cover crops alter nematode community composition and soil health dynamics in corn-soybean systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Crop production in the Lake Erie Basin, Ontario, Canada, is highly dynamic, with soil biota and water streams exposed to various agricultural stressors. Integrating winter cover crops (WCCs) is increasingly promoted in corn-soybean production systems to mitigate the negative impacts of agriculture. In the present study, morphological and metabarcoding methods were comparatively evaluated for assessing nematode community structure under corn-soybean cropping systems over two years, during WCC growth stages and prior to crop harvest. The WCC treatments included rye, a mixture of rye and barley, rye and oat, and fallow (no WCCs). This allowed us to have a snapshot of the temporal shifts in baseline and functional activities of the nematode food webs. The metabarcoding approach provided a higher taxonomic resolution across nematode feeding groups, detecting significantly greater bacterivore diversity (e.g. , Rhabditidae) compared to morphological analysis. While metabarcoding identified several rare genera, it underrepresented a few key genera, including Helicotylenchus and Filenchus . The morphological approach provided more accurate identification of herbivores and reliable quantitative data. Both identification methods demonstrated that WCC mixtures supported a more stable nematode community, as reflected by higher maturity and structure indices. Soil abiotic factors, such as texture, organic matter content, and cation exchange capacity, substantially influenced nematode community composition, indicating that these communities were shaped not only by WCC, but also by site-specific variability. We conclude that metabarcoding could be a valuable approach, but it still needs development and currently cannot replace the reference-based morphological approach. Therefore, integrating both morphological and metabarcoding data will provide a more comprehensive understanding of soil nematode ecology by enhancing the reliability of assessments and informing sustainable agricultural practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".