MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415199599 · doi:10.1093/fsr/owaf027

Human cadaver decomposition islands and forensic taphonomy: gravesoil δ13C and δ15N enrichment patterns in short (30 d) and extended (900 d) postmortem intervals

2025· article· en· W4415199599 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueForensic Sciences Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPaleopathology and ancient diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of FrederictonUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersTexas State UniversityFanconi Anemia Research Fund
KeywordsEdaphicDecompositionForensic sciencePostmortem ChangesHuman boneNitrogenHuman studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Soil forensics examines edaphic properties of evidentiary value in the immediate vicinity of human remains in a region called the cadaver decomposition island (CDI). As a body decomposes, soil in the CDI is permeated with liquified human nutrients and becomes gravesoil. This study is the first to specifically investigate how stable isotopes of carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) change in human gravesoils during decomposition over the postmortem interval (PMI). Gravesoil samples were analysed for %C, δ13C, %N, and δ15N in CDIs over the initial 30-d PMI (PMI30) and over longer PMIs up to 900 d (PMI900). Gravesoil %C and δ13C did not show any significant changes with decomposition progression in the PMI30 study. By days 10–15, gravesoil mean %N more than doubled from 0.4% to 1.05%, while mean gravesoil δ15N increased from 3.3‰ to 8.2‰ by day 10, up to a high mean of 9.9‰ on day 20. Both %N and δ15N remained significantly elevated for the entire PMI30 period. In the PMI900 study, gravesoils increased from 0.2%–0.8% N to a high of 1.9% N after 2–3 months, then decreased to 0.5%–0.6% in the 600–900 d time frame. Gravesoil δ15N originating at 2‰–4‰ was enriched by 15‰–20‰ after the first month, eventually declining to 9‰–11‰ after 600–900 d. We conclude that δ15N in human gravesoils has promise as a forensic tool to detect a CDI and correlate it with decomposition stage that adds to existing methods in estimating PMI, even if the body is absent. Key Points Soil forensics examines the products of human decomposition and their impacts on underlying gravesoil.Various forms of nitrogen and carbon have proven to be a useful indicator of the presence of gravesoils.%C, δ13C, %N, and δ15N in CDIs were measured at different depths and distances from the remains in the short PMI (30 d) and extended PMI (900 d).When compared to control soils, δ15N and %N levels in gravesoil increased by day 10, peaked by day 20, and remained high over the 30-d study. In the longer PMI study, %N returned to control levels in the 600–900 d time frame, while δ15N levels remained elevated at the end of the experiment.We conclude that δ15N is a useful indicator of not only the presence of a CDI but also has tangible use as a PMI estimation tool for forensic taphonomists.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.969

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it