MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415202709 · doi:10.47854/jwj2cm11

Nord

2025· article· fr· W4415202709 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Thierry Rodon

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropen · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEuropean Socioeconomic and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousContext (archaeology)Face (sociological concept)Identity (music)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le texte explore la pluralité du concept de « Nord », souvent perçu dans l’imaginaire occidental comme un espace glacé, vide et inhospitalier. Or, le Nord est habité depuis des millénaires par des peuples autochtones aux cultures riches et adaptées. Sa définition varie selon les contextes géographiques, politiques et culturels. Le concept de nordicité, développé par Hamelin, intègre des critères humains et sociaux. Le Nord reste cependant largement vu comme un réservoir de ressources pour le Sud, notamment dans le cadre de l’extraction de ses ressources. Face à cette vision extractiviste, les peuples autochtones revendiquent une autonomie et une reconnaissance accrue, marquée notamment par la réappropriation des territoires à travers leur dénomination en langues autochtones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropenSame topicEuropean Socioeconomic and Political StudiesFrench-language works237,207