L'essor de la vie culturelle au xxie siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis près de deux décennies, la vie culturelle en France et au Québec connaît un véritable essor – effet notable des politiques culturelles adoptées des deux côtés de l’Atlantique. Cela se traduit par des tensions et des mutations artistiques, sociales, culturelles, éducatives ou politiques. Dans tous les cas, des réflexions et un débat s’imposent qui conduisent à des choix stratégiques ou à des orientations et des recommandations s’adressant aux décideurs publics. Dans la foulée des projets de refonte et de mise à jour de politiques culturelles, des questions se posent, par exemple, sur les responsabilités des gouvernements face aux artistes, aux acteurs institutionnels et aux citoyens porteurs d’initiatives culturelles qui foisonnent en ce début de xxie siècle. Les auteurs de cet ouvrage examinent, selon leur point de vue – savant ou praticien –, les interventions visant à lier l’offre artistique aux divers publics ; ou celles en lien avec les milieux scolaires, communautaires et municipaux, ou encore et plus largement, celles qui soutiennent la diversité des expressions culturelles et des politiques publiques en culture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.019 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".