MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4415216767 · doi:10.1111/hdi.70028

Response to Commentary on “Exploring Oral Candidiasis in Hemodialysis Patients: <i>Candida</i> Species and Associated Risk Factor”

2025· letter· en· W4415216767 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abdol Sattar Pagheh, Maryam Erfaninejad, Aynaz Ghojoghi, Vajehallah Raeesi, Eisa Nazar, Mahnaz Fatahinia, Nafiseh Ramezani, Parvin Askari, Sharareh Zeighami Mohammadi, Masood Ziaee

Bibliographic record

VenueHemodialysis International · 2025
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemodialysisMEDLINERisk assessmentInfection riskMycosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0470.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHemodialysis International→Same topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility→French-language works237,207→