MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415218153 · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2025.116370

Hydrogen energy systems for decarbonizing smart cities and industrial applications: A review

2025· review· en· W4415218153 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Bakr Abdelghany, Atawulrahman Shafiqurrahman, Moataz Mohamed, Jiefeng Hu, Alfredo Vaccaro, Fei Gao, Mohamed Shawky El Moursi

Bibliographic record

VenueRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersKhalifa University of Science, Technology and Research
KeywordsEnergy (signal processing)Work (physics)Scope (computer science)Production (economics)Renewable energy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hydrogen is increasingly recognized as a key energy vector for achieving deep decarbonization across urban and industrial sectors. Supporting global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it is essential to understand the multi-sectoral role of the hydrogen value chain, spanning production, storage, and end-use applications, with particular emphasis on smart city systems and industrial processes. Green hydrogen production technologies, including alkaline water electrolysis (AWE), proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysis, anion exchange membrane (AEM) electrolysis, and solid oxide electrolysis cells (SOECs), are evaluated in terms of efficiency, scalability, and integration potential. Storage pathways are examined across physical storage (compressed gas, cryo-compressed, and liquid hydrogen), material-based storage (solid-state absorption in metal hydrides and chemical carriers such as LOHCs and ammonia), and geological storage (salt caverns, depleted gas reservoirs, and deep saline aquifers), highlighting their suitability for urban and industrial contexts. In the smart city domain, hydrogen is analyzed as an enabler of zero-emission transportation, low-carbon residential and commercial heating, and renewable-integrated smart grids with long-duration storage capabilities. System-level studies demonstrate that coordinated integration of these applications can deliver higher overall energy efficiency, deeper reductions in life-cycle GHG emissions, and improved resilience of urban energy systems compared with sector-specific approaches. Policy frameworks, safety standards, and digitalization strategies are reviewed to illustrate how hydrogen infrastructure can be embedded into interconnected urban energy systems. Furthermore, industrial applications focus on hydrogen’s potential to decarbonize energy-intensive processes and enable sector coupling between electricity, heat, and manufacturing. The environmental implications of hydrogen deployment are also considered, including resource efficiency, life-cycle emissions, and ecosystem impacts. In contrast to reviews addressing isolated aspects of hydrogen technologies, this study synthesizes technological, infrastructural, and policy dimensions, integrating insights from over 400 studies to highlight the multifaceted role of hydrogen in sustainable urban development and industrial decarbonization, and the added benefits achievable through coordinated, cross-sector deployment strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRenewable and Sustainable Energy ReviewsSame topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207