Practice What you Preach: The Association Between Child-Rearing Values, Tolerance of Outgroups, and Moral Identity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using Canadian (n = 4,018) and American (n = 2,596) Wave-7 data from the World Values Survey (WVS; 2017–2022), we investigated the association between child-rearing values and tolerance of neighbouring minorities. Respondents appraised the value of tolerance for others in the context of raising children, then completed a tolerance checklist regarding nine undesirable neighbours (e.g., heavy drinkers). Results supported our hypothesis that adults more tolerant of neighbours also considered the interpersonal value of tolerance and respect to be important when raising children. Women and childless respondents were more tolerant, as were those with more education. Respondent age group (18–34, 35–53, 54–93 years) moderated this association, wherein young childless adults exhibited the greatest tolerance. Conversely, intolerance was greatest towards heavy drinkers and drug addicts, whereas tolerance was greatest towards individuals of a different language, race, as well as unmarried couples cohabitating. Directions for future research are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".