MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415219894 · doi:10.1016/j.array.2025.100535

Multi-scale signal-to-noise driven fusion of post-processing sequences for enhanced defect detectability in active infrared thermography

2025· article· en· W4415219894 on OpenAlexaff
Rubén Usamentiaga, Стефано Сфарра, C. Ibarra-Castanedo, Hai Zhang, Xavier Maldague

Bibliographic record

VenueArray · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermographyVisibilityReliability (semiconductor)Metric (unit)Noise (video)FusionInfrared

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Active infrared thermography has emerged as a crucial tool in non-destructive testing, providing real-time visual representations of thermal patterns on material surfaces. However, detecting and analyzing defects can be challenging due to noise interference, the lack of standardization in post-processing techniques, complexity in data analysis, variability in defect visibility across frames, and the influence of environmental factors. To address these limitations, this study proposes a novel approach that enhances defect detectability by fusing multiple sequences derived from various post-processing methods into single, interpretable images. The proposed approach employs a multi-scale signal-to-noise ratio metric to accurately identify regions of interest and determine the optimal time at which defect detectability is maximized. Validation with two composite specimens featuring diverse defect characteristics demonstrates the capability of the method to simplify analysis and reliably improve detection performance. Compared with wavelet-based image fusion, the proposed approach achieves superior defect visibility and clarity, demonstrating a significant advancement in the effectiveness and reliability of thermographic inspections.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArraySame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207