MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415222209 · doi:10.1177/1753495x251386551

New onset refractory status epilepticus diagnosed in the second trimester: A case report

2025· article· en· W4415222209 on OpenAlexaff
Vesna Sokol Karadjole, Dareen AlShaer, John W. Snelgrove, Laurence Carmant, Ginette Moores

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEpilepsy research and treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLevetiracetamStatus epilepticusMidazolamRefractory (planetary science)EpilepsySedationIntubationPropofol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is a rare condition in which a previously healthy individual develops refractory seizures without an identifiable cause. In pregnancy, management is particularly challenging due to the need to control seizures while minimizing teratogenic risk for the fetus. We report a 22-year-old woman who developed NORSE at 19 weeks' gestation following recurrent tonic-clonic seizures. Treatment included multiple antiseizure medications: levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, lacosamide, clobazam, and lamotrigine. Due to super-refractory status, she required intubation and sedation with propofol and midazolam and was extubated once seizure-free. Following a breakthrough seizure and suicide attempt, levetiracetam was replaced with brivaracetam. Fetal growth and biophysical profile remained appropriate on serial surveillance. She underwent term induction of labor, delivering a healthy neonate without signs of withdrawal. This is the first reported case of second-trimester NORSE with favorable perinatal outcomes, underscoring the need for a multidisciplinary approach to balance seizure control and fetal safety.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetric MedicineSame topicEpilepsy research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207