MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415226238 · doi:10.1016/j.prrv.2025.10.002

Respiratory oscillometry in infants: present challenges and future opportunities

2025· review· en· W4415226238 on OpenAlexaff
Peter P. Moschovis, Danai Christina Theiopoulou, Colm P. Travers, Julian L. Allen, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Faustine Ceasor, Sotirios Fouzas, André Gie, Samuel Goldfarb, Diane Gray, Zoltán Hantos, Narayan P. Iyer, Larry C. Lands, Anna Lavizzari, Winston Manimtim, Eric D McCollum, Andrew Mutekanga, Clement L. Ren, Natalia Restrepo, Paul D. Robinson, Shannon J. Simpson, Peter D. Sly, Robert S. Tepper, Alexander Thomopulos, Marieke M. van der Zalm, Chiara Veneroni, Charl Verwey, Emanuela Zannin, Heather J. Zar, Serge Zigabe, Lennart K. A. Lundblad

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatric Respiratory Reviews · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal Respiratory Health Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreThornhill Medical (Canada)Montreal Children's Hospital
FundersEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials PartnershipNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteFogarty International CenterNational Institutes of HealthNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesEuropean Commission
KeywordsLung diseaseDiseaseLung functionBreathingMEDLINE

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.278
GPT teacher head0.442
Teacher spread0.163 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePaediatric Respiratory ReviewsSame topicNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchFrench-language works237,207