MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415227683 · doi:10.1016/j.japr.2025.100619

A survey of total nitrogen abundance in pullet and laying hen houses in Alberta, Canada

2025· article· en· W4415227683 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Joseph Brent Edvin Saharchuk, Mohamed Faizal Abdul-Careem, Hans D. Osthoff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Applied Poultry Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicOdor and Emission Control Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsNitrogenNitrogen dioxideCarbon dioxideAtmosphere (unit)AmmoniaNOxVolume (thermodynamics)Aerosol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ammonia (NH3) is the most abundant alkaline gas in the atmosphere and a major contributor to aerosol formation in ambient air, impacting climate and human health. Agricultural practices are a major atmospheric source of NH3 in the troposphere, yet observations of N-based compounds in agricultural settings have been sparse. This paper describes measurements of total nitrogen (Nt) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in 14 Alberta laying hen facilities. Mixing ratios of Nt and nitrogen oxides (NO and NOx) were monitored using a commercial chemiluminescence (CL) instrument equipped with an automated inlet filter valve to differentiate between gas-phase and total (i.e., gasand aerosol-) phase, and mixing ratios of CO2 were monitored using a non-dispersive infrared sensor (NDIR). The Nt budget was dominated by gas-phase NH3 whose mixing ratio varied greatly between barns, from 0.2 to 16 parts-per-million by volume (ppmv) and median level of 2.1 ppmv, compliant with the industry's NH3 standard of < 25 ppmv. Observed NOx levels were in the range of 1.5 to 22.3 parts-per-billion by volume (ppbv), median 11.3 ppbv, and were negligible compared to Nt. Mixing ratios of CO2 ranged from 629 to 2185 ppmv (median 1639 ppmv). Emission rates (ER) of NH3 were estimated from the observed CO2 enhancements relative to ambient air and an assumed ER of CO2 of 71.5 g d-1 bird-1 which ranged from 0.005 to 0.136 g d-1 bird-1 (median 0.046 g d-1 bird-1). This work is the first examination of air quality in Alberta poultry barns from a total nitrogen perspective and sets a baseline for future studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.935

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Applied Poultry ResearchSame topicOdor and Emission Control TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207