MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415230608 · doi:10.3390/w17202975

Heavy Metal Contamination and Bioaccumulation Patterns from a Ramsar Wetland Tributary, Northern Algeria: A Baseline Assessment

2025· article· en· W4415230608 on OpenAlexaff
S. Salhi, Mohammed Khalil Mellal, Abdelmadjid Chelli, Rassim Khelifa

Bibliographic record

VenueWater · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHeavy metals in environment
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioaccumulationContaminationBioconcentrationHazard quotientRamsar siteTributaryTrophic levelWetlandTransfer factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Freshwater ecosystems face increasing contamination by heavy metals, yet their transfer patterns remain poorly understood. This study aimed to assess the extent of pollution by ten potential toxic elements (As, Ni, Zn, Pb, Cd, Cr, Fe, Cu, Mn and Se) in water, sediment, Spirogyra sp., and two endemic fish species (Tropidophoxinellus callensis and Luciobarbus callensis) in the El Mellah River. The element concentrations were measured in four matrices using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry. Bioaccumulation Factor and Trophic Transfer Factor were used to depict bioaccumulation patterns across the ecological strata and two levels of the food web. The results showed that all sediment samples demonstrated very high ecological risk, consistently exceeding critical thresholds (PLI > 1, RI > 600). Contamination factor and geoaccumulation index revealed moderate to extreme contamination by As and Cd throughout all samples. Both fish species exhibited a bio-accumulation affinity for Cr, Cd, Mn, and Zn from water, while concurrently accumulating As from Spirogyra sp. Muscle tissue concentrations of As, Pb, Cr, and Cd in both species exceeded international guideline values. Health risk assessment indicated that children face elevated exposure risks, with Cd intake exceeding safe limits and total hazard quotient surpassing safety thresholds by 2.6-fold, while carcinogenic risks from Cd and Cr exceeded acceptable levels for both adults and children. These findings provide baseline contamination data for this tributary system and highlight elevated risks to both human health (through fish consumption) and ecosystem integrity, indicating the need for targeted monitoring and risk management measures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaterSame topicHeavy metals in environmentFrench-language works237,207