Application Value of Intelligent Quick Magnetic Resonance for Accelerating Brain MR Scanning and Improving Image Quality in Acute Ischemic Stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intelligent quick magnetic resonance (IQMR) for accelerating brain MRI scanning and improving image quality in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: In this prospective study, 58 patients with acute ischemic stroke underwent head MRI examinations between July 2023 and January 2024, including diffusion-weighted imaging and both conventional and accelerated T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery fat-saturated (T2-FLAIR) sequences. Accelerated sequences were processed using IQMR, producing IQMR-T1WI, IQMR-T2WI, and IQMR-T2-FLAIR images. Image quality was assessed qualitatively by two readers using a five-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic to 5 = excellent). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of lesions and surrounding tissues were quantitatively measured. The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was used to evaluate ischemia severity. RESULTS: Total scan time was reduced from 5 minutes 9 seconds to 2 minutes 40 seconds, accounting for a reduction of 48.22%. IQMR significantly improved SNR/CNR in accelerated sequences (P < .05), achieving parity with routine sequences (P > .05). Qualitative scores for lesion conspicuity and internal display improved post-IQMR (P < .05).. ASPECTS showed no significant difference between IQMR and routine images (P = 0.79; ICC = 0.91-0.93). DISCUSSION: IQMR addressed MRI's slow scanning limitation without hardware modifications, enhancing diagnostic efficiency. The results have been found to align with advancements in deep learning. Limitations included the small sample size and the exclusion of functional sequences. CONCLUSION: IQMR could significantly reduce brain MRI scanning time and enhance image quality in patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".