MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415240688 · doi:10.1038/s44319-025-00597-0

BICD2 promotes ciliogenesis by facilitating CP110 removal from the mother centriole

2025· article· en· W4415240688 on OpenAlexaff
Wenjun Kuang, Hao Jin, Shanshan Xie, Guangshuo Ou, Tianhua Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueEMBO Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersQianjiang Talents Fund of Zhejiang ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCiliogenesisCiliumCentrioleBasal bodyCentrosomeZebrafishGene knockdownSignal transducing adaptor protein

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cilia are hair-like organelles that protrude from the cell surface and play vital roles in embryonic development and tissue homeostasis. Removal of centriolar coiled-coil protein 110 (CP110) from the mother centriole is a critical step in ciliogenesis, yet the underlying mechanism remains largely unknown. In this study, we identify bicaudal D cargo adaptor 2 (BICD2) as a mother centriole protein that directly binds CP110 and facilitates its removal to promote ciliogenesis. Depletion of BICD2 significantly inhibits ciliogenesis and the removal of CP110, whereas knockdown of CP110 rescues ciliogenesis defects in BICD2-deficient cells. Additionally, we show that BICD2 is recruited to the mother centriole during ciliogenesis, where it directly binds and removes CP110. Moreover, zebrafish bicd2 morphants exhibit developmental abnormalities and defective ciliogenesis, which can be reversed by reintroducing bicd2 mRNA or depleting Cp110. Our findings establish BICD2 as a key regulator of ciliogenesis through its role in CP110 removal, shedding light on the molecular mechanisms of cilia formation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEMBO ReportsSame topicGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesFrench-language works237,207