MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415242813 · doi:10.1186/s40462-025-00600-2

Habitat conditions during winter explain movement among subpopulations of a declining migratory bird

2025· article· en· W4415242813 on OpenAlexafffund
Alexander R. Schindler, Anthony David Fox, Alyn Walsh, Larry Griffin, S. Kelly, Lei Cao, Mitch D. Weegman

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Ecology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Parks and Wildlife ServiceChinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of SaskatchewanInstitute for Wetland and Waterfowl Research, Ducks Unlimited CanadaUniversity of Missouri
KeywordsAnimal ecologyMetapopulationForagingHabitatPhilopatryPopulationMovement (music)Satellite tracking

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Understanding animal movement patterns among subpopulations is crucial for identifying spatiotemporal patterns in animal abundance. Quantifying such movement rates enables a better understanding of population dynamics and how animals decide to move between habitats throughout their range. However, detailed assessments of animal movements among subpopulations are often difficult to obtain with typical capture-mark-recapture methods, limiting our ability to incorporate movement information into conservation planning. METHODS: We used six years of high-resolution Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking data in a Bayesian multistate model to quantify habitat drivers of monthly intra- (i.e., from one month to the next within a winter) and inter-winter (i.e., from the last month of one winter to the first month of the following winter) movements among eight different subpopulations of a declining migratory bird, the Greenland white-fronted goose (Anser albifrons flavirostris). RESULTS: We found that while Greenland white-fronted geese were highly philopatric to geographically distinct wintering subpopulations, individuals made intra- and inter-winter movements based on locally available foraging habitat. These decisions changed within and among winters; geese were more likely to make intra-winter movements to areas with fewer croplands and boglands, potentially in response to local food depletion, and more likely to make inter-winter movements to areas with more boglands and “greener” grasslands. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a framework for using high-frequency GPS tracking data to discover movement patterns and test hypotheses about environmental drivers of movements, which could be linked with population dynamics and applied to other species of concern for an improved understanding of metapopulations across space and time. Implementing habitat management strategies that optimize foraging conditions throughout winter, including rewetting degraded peatlands to provide bogland food plants, provision of cereal stubbles in early winter and high-quality grasslands throughout winter may help improve conservation outcomes for Greenland white-fronted geese.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement EcologySame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207