Resting-state functional MRI derivatives: A dataset derived from the The Comprehensive Assessment of Neurodegeneration and Dementia Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) holds promise for the detection and characterisation of dementia. The Comprehensive Assessment of Neurodegeneration and Dementia (COMPASS-ND) Study, by the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in Aging (CCNA), provides a unique resource to study deeply phenotyped neurodegenerative conditions. We present RSFC derivatives for 784 participants (data release 7 of the cohort) who were either cognitively unimpaired or diagnosed primarily with Alzheimer's disease (AD), mixed dementia (AD with a vascular component), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), vascular MCI, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease with or without MCI or dementia, Lewy body disease or subjective cognitive impairment. Functional MRI scans were preprocessed using fMRIPrep, and time-series and whole-brain connectomes generated using three atlases at multiple resolutions, denoised using seven different techniques. High-motion artifacts were managed using a liberal quality control threshold appropriate for an older clinical population, resulting in data from 680 participants. These derivatives are made available to the research community to accelerate research on RSFC biomarkers of neurodegenerative disease, reducing duplication of effort, saving computational resources, and improving standardisation across studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".