MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415243708 · doi:10.1016/j.shj.2025.100726

Preprocedural CT and ECG Markers for Predicting Post-TAVR Pacemaker Requirement in High-Risk Patients

2025· article· en· W4415243708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Heart · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAortic rootElectrocardiographyProspective cohort studyPredictive value of testsComputed tomography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains a common complication. We aimed to assess computed tomography (CT)-based anatomical and electrocardiogram (ECG)-based parameters in a predictive model for PPI following TAVR. Methods: We assessed CT-based parameters, including the predicted course of the conduction axis from atrioventricular node to left bundle branch origin relative to the aortic virtual basal ring. Electrophysiological variables were combined in assessing a model to predict post-TAVR PPI. Results: Among 433 patients (mean age 82.0 [9.0] years, 54.0% female), 90 (21.0%) required PPI. Multiple binary logistic modeling demonstrated a shallower position of the membranous septum inferior margin midpoint increased the odds of PPI by 20% for every 1 mm (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.20) adjusted for the CT assessment phase. Increasing aortic root rotational angle associated with lower PPI odds (odds ratio [OR]: 0.98; 95% CI [0.95-1.00]), while an angle between the membranous septum midpoint and noncoronary leaflet nadir associated with increased PPI odds (OR: 1.04; 95% CI [1.01-1.08]). Preprocedural right bundle branch block and first-degree atrioventricular block associated with increased odds for PPI (OR: 3.76; 95% CI [1.71-8.21]; and OR: 1.84; 95% CI [1.06-3.18], respectively). The model had an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI [0.67-0.79]), sensitivity of 0.74 (95% CI [0.47-0.93]), and specificity of 0.65 (95% CI [0.40-0.87]) for predicting PPI requirement. Conclusions: A predictive model for determining the risk of PPI following TAVR is reported, combining comprehensive conduction-specific anatomical measurements relative to the aortic root and electrical measurements with clinical parameters. This model requires prospective application to understand its performance in the real-world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.503

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it