MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415243894 · doi:10.21037/jss-25-54

Measuring meaningful outcomes for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a narrative review and critical appraisal of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised (SRS-22r) instrument

2025· article· en· W4415243894 on OpenAlexaff
Armaan K. Malhotra, Christopher S. Lozano, Vishwathsen Karthikeyan, Jennifer A. Dermott, Jefferson R. Wilson, Unni Narayanan, David E. Lebel

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Spine Surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoToronto Public Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCritical appraisalNarrative reviewScoliosisIdiopathic scoliosisNarrativeSelf-report studyMeasure (data warehouse)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Objective: The Scoliosis Research Society-22 revised questionnaire (SRS-22r) is the most widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQL) for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Here, we seek to critically appraise the development process and psychometric properties of the SRS-22r. Methods: We evaluated the item generation, item reduction, sensibility and measurement properties including reliability, validity and responsiveness of the SRS-22r. To accomplish this, we examined available literature describing psychometric properties of the SRS-22r and summarized the findings in a narrative review format. Key Content and Findings: The SRS-22r represents a multi-dimensional outcome measure that demonstrates generally appropriate responsiveness to outcomes after surgical AIS deformity correction. Despite its strengths, several limitations were identified, including (I) absence of a conceptual framework for HRQL in AIS; (II) lack of direct patient involvement during development of the instrument; (III) minimal evidence of evaluation of the interpretation, appropriateness and importance, comprehensiveness of the items by adolescents; and (IV) the inclusion of a satisfaction with treatment (surgery) domain within a HRQL instrument. Though the SRS-22r is responsive to change after surgical intervention, its ability to discriminate between mild and moderate scoliosis remains limited. Conclusions: Our findings characterize the strengths and limitations of the SRS-22r. An ideal AIS HRQL measure should be guided by a conceptual framework informed by, and aligned with the priorities and goals of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis based on their lived experience, complemented by parental perspectives and input from clinician experts with an understanding AIS management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.032
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.153
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.168

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0320.153
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.004
Bibliometrics0.0130.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Spine SurgerySame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207