Navigating ternary doping in Li-ion cathodes with closed-loop multi-objective Bayesian optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To further improve secondary battery materials, we are increasingly exploring highly complex composition spaces in attempts to optimize multiple properties simultaneously. While our past work has done this in systematic manners using high-throughput experimentation, the exponential increase in the search space with triple doping makes grid search prohibitively expensive. Here, we demonstrate a closed-loop, multi-objective machine learning approach to guide the high-throughput workflow to efficiently navigate a space with approximately 14 million unique combinations. The test system is LiCoPO4 which we have previously explored using systematic codoping that was effective in optimizing one property only: energy density. To learn multiple electrochemical metrics, we first pretrain a set transformer on the public Materials Project database as a feature extractor, then attach a multi-task Gaussian process head and finetune the entire model on our high-throughput data. Through 3 rounds of active learning, we demonstrate that with a very small number of samples (as few as 125 random compositions and 63 predicted) we are able to simultaneously optimize four key electrochemical properties. Relative to the undoped system, the best composition raises our composite figure of merit by up to five times. This establishes an end-to-end workflow for accelerated battery materials design to be used in the rapidly growing field of autonomous materials discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".