MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Digital Transformation in Taiwan’s Insurance Industries for MABAC Technology Based on Circular Modified Fuzzy Choquet Frank Network Data Envelopment Analysis

2025· article· en· W4415246480 on OpenAlex
Zeeshan Ali, Dragan Pamucar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Analysis and Applications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCustomer churn and segmentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Science and Technology Council
KeywordsData envelopment analysisRanking (information retrieval)Fuzzy logicOperator (biology)Fuzzy setTransformation (genetics)ImperfectAnalytic hierarchy processSet (abstract data type)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fuzzy set theory has significant and dominant applications in Taiwan’s insurance industry, especially in fields involving decision-making, uncertainty, and risk assessment. Providing the complexity and problems in assessing factors, for instance, natural disaster risks, customer creditworthiness, or health conditions, traditional binary logic often falls short. Taiwanese insurers have adopted fuzzy logic systems to enhance fraud detection, premium pricing, and privilege evaluations by catching the indistinctness characteristic in human ruling and imperfect data. The Taiwan insurance industry is a dynamic and spirited module of the commercial sector, contributing meaningfully to risk management and economic stability. For this, we study to propose an assessment of the proficiency of insurance enterprises using Network Data Envelopment Analysis. Toward this end, the frank operational laws for circular Pythagorean fuzzy (CPF) uncertainty are applied. Moreover, the CPF Choquet Frank averaging (CPFCFA) operator and CPF Choquet Frank geometric (CPFCFG) operator with three dominant properties for each operator have been studied. The study deliberates the multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) model and verifies it with the help of numerical examples. This study enhances the industry’s efficiency to offer adapted insurance products and handle risks precisely, aligning with Taiwan’s push toward intelligent financial services and digital transformation. In the following, we establish the decision-making performance for assessing the proficiency of insurance enterprises using the network data envelopment analysis (NDEA) technique. Finally, we examine the ranking values of offered representations to compare them with the ranking values of prevailing models to show the capability and efficacy of the originated approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.884
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it