MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415247385 · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118651

Erratum to “Autophagy inhibition enhances sensitivity of alpelisib in PI3K–mutated non-small cell lung cancer” [Biomed. Pharmacother. 192 (2025), 118620]

2025· erratum· en· W4415247385 on OpenAlexaff
Jinyoung Kim, Chandani Shrestha, Tae Woo Kim, Sang‐Bin Lee, Gwangbin Lee, Dasom Jung, Min Hwang, Shinwon Kang, Hyung Soon Park, Hyunho Kim, Ho Jung An, Dongwoo Chae, Byoung Yong Shim

Bibliographic record

VenueBiomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · 2025
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutophagy in Disease and Therapy
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSensitivity (control systems)CellLungHuman lung

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.097

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBiomedicine & PharmacotherapySame topicAutophagy in Disease and TherapyFrench-language works237,207