MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415258162 · doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101630

Automated enforcement of bus-only lanes and crossings with policy and implementation insights from a Calgary case study

2025· article· en· W4415258162 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Bilal Dawood, Zaid Mujtaba, Pedram Akbari, Saeid Saidi

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Studies on Transport Policy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesSAIT PolytechnicUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsIndian Institute of Science
KeywordsEnforcementLicenseProcess (computing)Global Positioning SystemAgency (philosophy)Transit (satellite)Public transportPedestrian crossing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• Proposes cost-effective framework for bus-only lane and crossing enforcement. • Combines Raspberry Pi, GPS, and LiDAR for automated violation detection. • Uses YOLOv8 and PaddleOCR for vehicle, plate, and pedestrian recognition. • Field-tested in Calgary on 18 bus lanes and one bus-only crossing corridor. • Provides policy insights for scalable, reliable transit priority enforcement. With further attention to improving public transit service quality and reliability, transit priority measures such as bus-only lanes and bus-only crossings are becoming more common. These measures are only effective if priority can be maintained for transit, and access for regular vehicles is restricted. This can be only achieved by regulating their usage and enforcing these regulations. However, enforcement measures to prevent unauthorized vehicles from using bus-only lanes and bus-only crossings have been a manual process or employed costly systems such as bus traps in many cities. Automating this enforcement process through digital technologies can lead to substantial benefits and cost savings. Nevertheless, academic and professional literature on automated enforcement of bus-only lanes and bus-only crossings using advanced image and video processing techniques is limited. In this study, we propose a framework and guidelines for these automated enforcement systems that can be implemented by any transit agency at a low cost. We outlined our framework using three components: Hardware proof of concept, software design containing an image processing model, and user interface. We used a Raspberry Pi for hardware, PaddleOCR for license plate recognition and YOLOv8 for training our model. The operation of the system was further optimized using GPS (for bus-only lanes) and LiDAR (for bus-only crossings) sensors. To assess the applicability of our framework, we tested it on several bus-only lanes and a bus-only crossing in Calgary. The results showed a cost-effective solution while providing good performance in detecting violations and identifying unauthorized vehicles and pedestrians. The observations presented in the study can provide valuable insights to any transit agency for future implementations and policy-making process of automated bus-only lanes and bus-only crossings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.757
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCase Studies on Transport PolicySame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207