MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415258624 · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2025.106906

Who gets to use the street? Evaluate the utilization and inclusiveness using crowdsourced videos and vision-language models

2025· article· en· W4415258624 on OpenAlexaff
Xiamengwei Zhang, Mingze Chen, Yongming Huang

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Cities and Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedestrianStreet networkData collectionEquity (law)Construct (python library)Urban planningSocial equalityPublic transportSustainable development

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• The study proposes a framework for evaluating public street spaces. • We collect data from riders to build the largest known street dataset in Beijing. • We train a vision-language model to identify demographic groups and behaviors. • The study reveals uneven pedestrian patterns across age groups and street segments. Equitable access to public street spaces (PSS) represents a fundamental prerequisite for sustainable urban development, yet systematic evaluation frameworks remain inadequately developed. Existing studies suffer from demographic homogenization assumptions, and insufficient data resolution. The deficiency undermines the effective utilization and full inclusiveness of PSS, ultimately constraining street vitality, social cohesion, and progress toward sustainable development goals. We introduce a crowdsourced data collection method based on food delivery riders, significantly enhancing the detail and coverage of the dataset. Therefore, we collect over 11,000 hours of video and construct the “EgoCity Dataset”. Subsequently, we develop a powerful vision-language model (VLM) capable of identifying demographic groups and behaviors (F1-score: 0.9583), addressing critical gaps in existing computer vision applications for urban analysis. Finally, we propose a framework for evaluating PSS, which quantifies the actual level of urban vitality and spatial equity through two key indicators: utilization and inclusiveness. The main findings are: (1) At the individual level, pedestrian distribution shows significant demographic disparities, with adults dominating both volume and activity diversity. (2) At the street level, there is a spatial mismatch between pedestrian flow and residential population. (3) At the regional level, spatial advantages and resources are concentrated in select areas at the expense of broader equity. Our study proposes a low-cost data collection method, and is the first to integrate crowdsourced street video data with vision-language models for pedestrian group identification, as well as to introduce a novel framework for evaluating utilization and inclusiveness in public street spaces. This study offers practical tools for urban planning and advances the sustainable development goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainable Cities and SocietySame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207