MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415260891 · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.09.013

Exploring Latin America one cell at a time

2025· article· en· W4415260891 on OpenAlexaff
Patrícia A. Possik, David J. Adams, Flavia C. Aguiar, Tamires Caixeta Alves, Fabíola Silva Alves-Hanna, Carlos Mario Restrepo Arboleda, Erick Armingol, Liã Bárbara Arruda, Yesid Cuesta-Astroz, Jacqueline Marcia Boccacino, Danielle Cabral Bonfim, Juan F. Calderón, Alexis Germán Murillo Carrasco, Danielle Gonçalves de Carvalho, Benilton S. Carvalho, Paulo Vinícius Sanches Daltro de Carvalho, Alex Castro, Lia Chappell, Ricardo Chinchilla, Daniela Di Bella, Sandra Martha Gomes Dias, Rafaela Fagundes, Bianca Braga Frade, Federico J Garde, Hugo González, Gabriela Guimarães, Lucas Inchausti, Edith C. Kordon, Laura Leaden, Rafael Silva Lima, Álvaro Lladser, Julieth López-Castiblanco, Isabela Malta, Vinicius Maracaja‐Coutinho, Doménica Marchese, Alice Matimba, Andrés Moreno‐Estrada, Marcelo A. Mori, Helder I. Nakaya, Silvana Pereyra, Yasmin Bandeira Ramos, Natalia Rego, Carla Daniela Robles‐Espinoza, Adolfo Rojas-Hidalgo, María Natalia Rubinsztain, Leandro dos Santos, Anita Scoones, Patrícia Severino, Annie Cristhine Moraes Sousa‐Squiavinato, Lucía Spangenberg, Ana Victoria Suescún, Nayara Gusmão Tessarollo, Martha Estefania Vázquez‐Cruz, Ma’n H. Zawati, João P. B. Viola, Mariana Boroni

Bibliographic record

VenueCell · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersInstitut National Du CancerRoyal SocietyChan Zuckerberg InitiativeWellcome Trust
KeywordsLatin AmericansEmerging technologiesThe InternetDevelopment studiesGenomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.103

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCellSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207