MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL TOOLS IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION: TRENDS, COUNTRIES, AND EMERGING KEYWORDS

2025· article· W4415262603 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sara LUMA-RAMANI, Alit IBRAIMI, Shkurte Luma-Osmani, Florim Idrizi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Natural Sciences and Mathematics of UT · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThematic mapThematic analysisWork (physics)Set (abstract data type)CitationCitation analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work undertakes a bibliometric study and analysis of the scientific literature dealing with digital tools in teaching mathematics from 2000 to 2025, sourced from IEEE Xplore. Its goal is to shed light on thematic trends, geographical research impact, and common keywords, titles, and co-authors in this very rapidly evolving world. The data set contains 1,152 scientific contributions, mostly conference papers (80.38%), reflecting the dynamic and ever-changing nature of the field. Keyword analysis unveiled five thematic clusters, indicating the integration of STEM, AI, and cybersecurity in education methodologies. The United States remains at the top in terms of citation and h-index, followed by China, Israel, India, and Canada. Within the Balkans, Turkey enjoys scientific supremacy, while North Macedonia seems starved of recognition, with a single publication to its account, and none cited. According to the results, the research interest is shifting away from work on traditional educational constructs to those on artificial intelligence in education and science.This work undertakes a bibliometric study and analysis of the scientific literature dealing with digital tools in teaching mathematics from 2000 to 2025, sourced from IEEE Xplore. Its goal is to shed light on thematic trends, geographical research impact, and common keywords, titles, and co-authors in this very rapidly evolving world. The data set contains 1,152 scientific contributions, mostly conference papers (80.38%), reflecting the dynamic and ever-changing nature of the field. Keyword analysis unveiled five thematic clusters, indicating the integration of STEM, AI, and cybersecurity in education methodologies. The United States remains at the top in terms of citation and h-index, followed by China, Israel, India, and Canada. Within the Balkans, Turkey enjoys scientific supremacy, while North Macedonia seems starved of recognition, with a single publication to its account, and none cited. According to the results, the research interest is shifting away from work on traditional educational constructs to those on artificial intelligence in education and science.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesBibliometrics
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.566
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0520.131
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Natural Sciences and Mathematics of UTSame topicTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesFrench-language works237,207