MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415265742 · doi:10.1108/jkm-03-2025-0280

Examining the interdependent role of digitalization and external search breadth in driving service innovation in SMEs

2025· article· en· W4415265742 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Knowledge Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour
Canadian institutionsMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsService innovationGeneralizability theoryService (business)InterdependenceSurvey data collectionInnovation managementDual (grammatical number)Limiting

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose This study aims to examine the impact of digitalization on service innovation performance in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), focusing on how external search breadth moderates this relationship. The goal is to understand how digital transformation and external knowledge sourcing interact to influence innovation outcomes. Design/methodology/approach The study is based on a quantitative analysis of a survey conducted with 489 Canadian SMEs. Probit regression models are used to examine the curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) relationship between digitalization and service innovation, and how these changes when external search breadth is introduced as a moderating variable. Findings The results confirm an inverted U-shaped relationship between digitalization and service innovation in SMEs. However, when external search breadth is high, the relationship changes to a U-shape, indicating that digitalization’s impact on innovation depends on the extent of external knowledge sourcing. Digitalization enhances service innovation but shows diminishing returns when over-applied without appropriate external search breadth. Research limitations/implications The study’s findings are based on a sample of Canadian SMEs, limiting the generalizability to other contexts. Future research could explore longitudinal data to assess changes over time. Practical implications SME managers should balance their investments in digitalization with external knowledge sourcing to maximize innovation performance, avoiding over-reliance on one approach. Originality/value This study extends the literature by providing empirical evidence on the dual effect of digitalization and external search breadth on service innovation, specifically in SMEs. It introduces the concept of a shape-flip in the relationship between digitalization and innovation, contingent on external search breadth, a novel contribution to the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score0.185

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it