Discovery of a First-in-Class Small-Molecule Ligand for WDR91 Using DNA-Encoded Chemical Library Selection Followed by Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
WD40 repeat-containing protein 91 (WDR91) regulates early-to-late endosome conversion and plays vital roles in endosome fusion, recycling, and transport. WDR91 was recently identified as a potential host factor for viral infection. We employed DNA-encoded chemical library (DEL) selection against the WDR domain of WDR91, followed by machine learning to predict ligands from the synthetically accessible Enamine REAL database. Screening of predicted compounds identified a WDR91 selective compound 1, with a KD of 6 ± 2 μM by surface plasmon resonance. The co-crystal structure confirmed the binding of 1 to the WDR91 side pocket, in proximity to cysteine 487, which led to the discovery of covalent analogues 18 and 19. The covalent adduct formation for 18 and 19 was confirmed by intact mass liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The discovery of 1, 18, and 19, accompanying structure-activity relationship, and the co-crystal structures provide valuable insights for designing potent and selective chemical tools against WDR91 to evaluate its therapeutic potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".