Improving Coronary Artery Disease Diagnosis in Cardiac MRI with Self-Supervised Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Background/Objectives: The excessive dependence on data annotation, the lack of labeled data, and the substantial expense of data annotation, especially in healthcare, have constrained the efficacy of conventional supervised learning methodologies. Self-supervised learning (SSL) has arisen as a viable option by utilizing unlabeled data via pretext tasks. This paper examines the efficacy of supervised (pseudo-labels) and unsupervised (no pseudo-labels) pretext models in semi-supervised learning (SSL) for the classification of coronary artery disease (CAD) utilizing cardiac MRI data, highlighting performance in scenarios of data scarcity, out-of-distribution (OOD) conditions, and adversarial robustness. Methods: Two datasets, referred to as CAD Cardiac MRI and Ohio State Cardiac MRI Raw Data (OCMR), were utilized to establish three pretext tasks: (i) supervised Gaussian noise addition, (ii) supervised image rotation, and (iii) unsupervised generative reconstruction. These models were evaluated against Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning (SimCLR), a prevalent unsupervised contrastive learning framework. Performance was assessed under three data reduction scenarios (20%, 50%, 70%), out-of-distribution situations, and adversarial attacks utilizing FGSM and PGD, alongside other significant evaluation criteria. Results: The Gaussian noise-based model attained the highest validation accuracy (up to 99.9%) across all data reduction scenarios and exhibited superiority over adversarial perturbations and all other employed measures. The rotation-based model exhibited considerable susceptibility to attacks and diminished accuracy with reduced data. The generative reconstruction model demonstrated moderate efficacy with minimal performance decline. SimCLR exhibited strong performance under standard conditions but shown inferior robustness relative to the Gaussian noise model. Conclusions: Meticulously crafted self-supervised pretext tasks exhibit potential in cardiac MRI classification, showcasing dependable performance and generalizability despite little data. These initial findings underscore SSL’s capacity to create reliable models for safety-critical healthcare applications and encourage more validation across varied datasets and clinical environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".