Réverbérer la recherche électroacoustique : le centre Tempo Reale de Florence, entre histoire et actualité
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Francesco Giomi, après avoir travaillé avec Luciano Berio, a joué un rôle déterminant dans l’évolution de Tempo Reale, le centre de recherche et de création musicale fondé par ce dernier. Sous sa direction, à partir de 2008, des domaines variés tels que le live electronics, les sound studies, l’improvisation électroacoustique et l’interactivité sont devenus des axes centraux des activités du centre. Il a notamment mis en place des événements tels que le Tempo Reale Festival, qui ont permis de diffuser la musique électronique et la recherche musicale à Florence, tout en renforçant les collaborations internationales, Québec compris. Giomi a également mis l’accent sur son rôle de professeur et pédagogue, accompagnant de jeunes compositeurs et compositrices. Sous sa direction, Tempo Reale est devenu un lieu de création unique, où se croisent diverses formes artistiques et disciplines, favorisant une approche collective de la recherche musicale. Aujourd’hui, le centre poursuit son exploration de nouveaux horizons créatifs, tout en préservant l’héritage de Berio.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".