MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415280517 · doi:10.1158/2767-9764.crc-25-0305

The ATR Inhibitor Elimusertib in Combination with Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A California Cancer Consortium Phase I Trial (NCI 10404)

2025· article· en· W4415280517 on OpenAlexaff
Mamta Parikh, Nataliya V. Uboha, Naoko Takebe, Kit Tam, Philippe L. Bédard, Kari B. Wisinski, Arjun Mittra, Ming Yin, Yuanquan Yang, Anne M. Noonan, Julianne L. Holleran, Christopher Ruel, Paul Frankel, Jan H. Beumer, Edward M. Newman, Alexey V. Danilov, Steven D. Gore, Primo N. Lara

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
FundersNational Cancer InstituteAstraZenecaBristol-Myers SquibbEli Lilly and CompanyPharmaceuticals BayerIpsenAstellas PharmaEisaiGilead SciencesPfizerNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Health and Human Services
KeywordsCisplatinSolid tumorClinical trialCancerPhases of clinical researchAtaxia-telangiectasia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related kinase inhibitor elimusertib synergizes with cisplatin preclinically. We evaluated the clinical feasibility of combining elimusertib with cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors who had received <300 mg/m2 of prior cisplatin, and for whom cisplatin-based treatment was deemed appropriate, were enrolled according to a standard 3 + 3 design, starting elimusertib at 20 mg orally twice daily on days 2 and 9, with cisplatin 60 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Primary objectives were the determination of the maximum tolerated dose and safety. Secondary objectives included the assessment of elimusertib pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled. Dose level -2 (elimusertib 20 mg once on day 2 and cisplatin 30 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) was deemed the maximum tolerated dose; dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) including creatinine increase, hypokalemia, febrile neutropenia, neutropenia, syncope, and thrombocytopenia, required dose de-escalation. Although the four patients with the highest elimusertib exposure all experienced hematologic DLTs within 1 week, they also received a higher day 1 cisplatin dose, precluding a definitive association of elimusertib exposure with DLT occurrence. Of 10 evaluable patients, one (10%) with clear-cell ovarian cancer had a partial response, whereas five (50%) had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin combined with elimusertib was associated with hematologic toxicity requiring significant dose de-escalation. Elimusertib pharmacokinetics was consistent with prior studies. Only modest activity was observed. Further clinical evaluation of elimusertib plus cisplatin is not warranted. SIGNIFICANCE: Preclinical data suggest synergy between cisplatin and the ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibitor elimusertib, leading to this phase Ib trial in advanced solid tumors evaluating feasibility. The results do not support further examination of the combination due to DLTs observed in the absence of robust efficacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.189
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.368 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research CommunicationsSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207