MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415280859 · doi:10.63332/joph.v5i10.3547

Experiences of Older People Living with Frailty Transitioning from Hospital to Home — A Qualitative Descriptive Study

2025· article· W4415280859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Posthumanism · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity Health NetworkYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careFocus groupQualitative researchEquity (law)Older peopleTransitional careDescriptive researchResource (disambiguation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This qualitative study explores the experiences of older people living with frailty, their informal caregivers, healthcare professionals, and administrators during the transition from hospital to home within the Ontario Health Teams (OHT) model. Using focus group discussions (FG1: older adults and caregivers, FG2: healthcare administrators, and FG3: healthcare professionals), the study identifies six key themes critical to successful care transitions: 1) healthcare as holistic care, 2) the therapeutic value of familiar surroundings, 3) the need for patient and caregiver voice and choice, 4) the challenges of navigating the disconnect between hospital and community care, 5) the importance of supporting informal caregivers, and 6) the impact of income, language, and equity on care access. The findings highlight significant communication, coordination, and resource allocation gaps impeding effective transitions. Such problems are associated with emotional strains of patients, caregivers, and health care providers, and higher chances of caregiver burnout and hospital readmission. The paper highlights the necessity of integrated, patient-centred care models, in which a smooth transition, effective communication, and active participation of patients and caregivers in the care planning are essential. A solution to these issues is the proposed Integrated Transitional Care Model (ITCM), based on the insights of the study, to enhance care coordination, decrease readmissions, and offer equitable care to older adults who may be frail. The study highlights the need to develop a collaborative healthcare system in which all stakeholders, including patients, caregivers, medical practitioners, and administrators, collaborate to facilitate smooth and well-coordinated transitions and better health results. The results present meaningful policy, practice, and research implications to improve care transitions of frail older adults in Ontario and elsewhere.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it