MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415281107 · doi:10.1111/jdv.70115

Deep and disseminated dermatophytosis in immunocompromised populations—A systematic review

2025· review· en· W4415281107 on OpenAlexafffund
Aditya K. Gupta, Tong Wang, Susmita Susmita, Ditte Marie Lindhardt Saunte, Roderick J. Hay, Vincent Piguet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNail Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMediprobe Research (Canada)Women's College HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersBausch HealthLEO PharmaIncyteCelgeneSanofiPfizerEli Lilly and CompanyBristol-Myers Squibb
KeywordsMEDLINEMycosisHealth careHealthcare systemImmunosuppression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Dermatophytes-a group of obligate keratinophilic fungi that infect the skin, hair and nails-represent the most common cause of fungal infections worldwide. In immunocompromised individuals, a growing body of literature has documented rare instances of dermatophyte infections of the dermis and subcutaneous tissue, which can lead to deep dermatophytosis with systemic dissemination and pseudomycetoma as secondary complications. OBJECTIVES: To assess patient characteristics, risk factors, diagnostic evidence and treatment options for deep dermatophytosis. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in June 2025 to identify patients presenting with deep dermatophytosis of the glabrous skin; all cases were validated by confirmatory testing per histopathologic examination and fungal culture. Majocchi's granuloma diagnoses were excluded. RESULTS: The search yielded 96 studies (1954-2025) documenting 134 patients. The number of reports has notably increased since the 21st century; however, diagnosis remains challenging due to possible dermatophyte adaptation in the dermal/subcutaneous environment. Trichophyton rubrum is the most frequently isolated pathogen. Acquired immunodeficiencies (e.g. renal transplant recipients) and primary immunodeficiencies (e.g. CARD9, STAT3 mutations) elevate the risk of deep dermatophytosis. Systemic dissemination, often accompanied by lymphadenopathy, was reported in 24 patients, with the most common being infection of the axillary and inguinal lymph nodes. Infections of the bones, lungs, and brain were also reported. Terbinafine (125-1000 mg/day) and itraconazole (100-400 mg/day), with adjunctive topical antifungals and surgical interventions, have been tried for deep dermatophytosis. The use of newer triazoles (voriconazole, posaconazole) should follow the principles of antifungal stewardship and therapeutic drug monitoring recommendations. Multidrug resistance is a potential concern in immunocompromised patients who will often require extended or lifelong treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare providers should be cognizant that dermatophytosis may become invasive and disseminated in immunocompromised populations. Testing and early treatment should not be overlooked in these patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0080.010
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and VenereologySame topicNail Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207