MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Sparse polygenic risk score inference with the spike-and-slab LASSO

2025· article· en· W4415283170 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Junyi Song, Shadi Zabad, Archer Y. Yang, Simon Gravel, Yue Li

Bibliographic record

VenueBioinformatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsMcGill Genome CentreMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsInferenceLasso (programming language)R packagePolygenic risk scoreCovariateElastic net regularizationSoftware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MOTIVATION: Large-scale biobanks, with rich phenotypic and genomic data across hundreds of thousands of samples, provide ample opportunities to elucidate the genetics of complex traits and diseases. Consequently, there is growing demand for robust and scalable methods for disease risk prediction from genotype data. Inference in this setting is challenging due to the high-dimensionality of genomic data, especially when coupled with smaller sample sizes. Popular Polygenic Risk Score (PRS) inference methods address this challenge by adopting sparse Bayesian priors or penalized regression techniques, such as the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO). However, the former class of methods are not as scalable and do not produce exact sparsity, while the latter tends to over-shrink large coefficients. RESULTS: In this study, we present SSLPRS, a novel PRS method based on the Spike-and-Slab LASSO (SSL) prior, which offers a theoretical bridge between the two frameworks. We extend previous work to derive a coordinate-ascent inference algorithm that operates on GWAS summary statistics, which is orders-of-magnitude more efficient than corresponding individual-level-based implementations. To illustrate the statistical properties of the proposed model, we conducted experiments involving nine simulation configurations and nine quantitative phenotypes from the UK Biobank. Our results demonstrate that SSLPRS is competitive with state-of-the-art methods in terms of prediction accuracy and exhibits superior variable selection performance, especially in sparse genetic architectures. In simulations, this translates to upwards of 50% improvement in positive predictive value. In analysis of real phenotypes, we show that selected variants are highly enriched for meaningful genomic annotations and have better replication rates in larger meta-analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: SSLPRS is available in the open-source package https://github.com/li-lab-mcgill/penprs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioinformaticsSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207