Thermal Rectification in One-Dimensional Atomic Chains with Mass Asymmetry and Nonlinear Interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding and controlling thermal rectification is pivotal for designing phononic devices that guide heat flow in a preferential direction. This study investigates one-dimensional atomic chains with binary mass asymmetry and nonlinear interatomic potentials, focusing on how energy propagates under thermal and wave excitation. Two potential models—the β-FPU and Morse potentials—were employed to examine the role of nonlinearity and bond softness in energy transport. Simulations reveal strong directional energy transport governed by the interplay of mass distribution, nonlinearity, and excitation type. In FPU chains, pronounced rectification occurs: under “cold-heavy” conditions, energy in the left segment increases from ~1% to over 63%, while reverse (“hot-heavy”) cases show less than 4% net transfer. For wave-driven excitation, the rectification coefficient reaches ~0.58 at 100:1. In contrast, Morse-based systems exhibit weaker rectification (∆E < 1%) and structural instabilities at high asymmetry due to bond breaking. A comprehensive summary and heatmap visualization highlight how system parameters govern rectification efficiency. These findings provide mechanistic insights into nonreciprocal energy transport in nonlinear lattices and offer design principles for nanoscale thermal management strategies based on controlled asymmetry and potential engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".