MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

HealthEase: A Centralized Digital Health Record Platform for Secure and Efficient Healthcare Management

2025· article· W4415285121 on OpenAlexaff
Gargi Sharma, A. Robert Singh, Gaurav Soni, Parth Patil

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldHealth Professions
TopicElectronic Health Records Systems
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth careCloud computingEncryptionAuthentication (law)ScheduleData sharingData securityDigital health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

HealthEase serves as the one-stop shopping experience for users since they would easily store their patients’ medical history, laboratory test results, and treatment plan statuses with no one else. Using safe cloud technology and modernity of data sharing standards, the digitized platform portrays the quick yet reliable access to health records. It displays features such as real-time ambulance tracking, SOS emergency alert, and updates on the availability of hospital beds to accelerate responses during emergencies. There’s nothing more to daily health use than making it easy to find healthcare providers, schedule appointments, and conduct blood donation drives through HealthEase. The advanced security considerations designed into the platform include robust encryption (AES-256) and multi-factor authentication for securing sensitive data when accessed. In addition to this, it utilizes also RESTful APIs and FHIR standards where applicable, which guarantees hassle-free data sharing between different systems. Through vigorous testing, HealthEase has proved to be able to fill in all the existing voids in the health sector by providing a dependable, user-friendly solution in delivering patient-centric solutions. It thus aims at revolutionizing healthcare to more accessible, secure, and efficient means.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.413
Teacher spread0.367 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectronic Health Records Systems→French-language works237,207→