MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415285448 · doi:10.1177/20552076251386662

The role of AI-driven art therapy in supporting autism, mental health, and emotional well-being: An umbrella review

2025· review· en· W4415285448 on OpenAlexaff
Sumaiya Yeasmin, Sanchita Saha, Moustaq Karim Khan Rony, Mst Masuma Akter Semi, Rukshanda Rahman, Afia Fairooz Tasnim, A. S. M. Sanwar Hosen

Bibliographic record

VenueDigital Health · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArt Therapy and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsWycliffe College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychological interventionMental healthTransformative learningArt therapyTherapeutic relationshipPsychological therapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into therapeutic practices has introduced new possibilities for enhancing mental health interventions. Among these innovations, AI-driven art therapy has emerged as a promising approach, combining the expressive and healing aspects of traditional art therapy with the adaptive and analytical strengths of AI. This modality shows particular potential in supporting individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), mental health challenges, and those seeking emotional well-being. Aim: This umbrella review aimed to synthesize and evaluate existing evidence on the application, effectiveness, and implementation of AI-driven art therapy in improving outcomes for individuals with ASD, mental health conditions, and emotional distress. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted across multiple databases-including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library-to identify systematic and scoping reviews that adhered to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The methodological quality of included reviews was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist. Thematic analysis was applied to extract and synthesize recurring patterns and core themes across studies. Results: The findings revealed significant therapeutic benefits of AI-driven art therapy, including enhanced communication and emotional regulation in individuals with ASD, and reduced symptoms of anxiety, depression, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in mental health populations. Additionally, the platforms improved emotional well-being through personalized engagement, self-reflection, and increased autonomy. However, technological barriers, ethical concerns, and accessibility issues were noted as key limitations. Conclusions: AI-driven art therapy represents a transformative and accessible tool in modern therapeutic practices. While challenges remain, its potential to support diverse populations through individually tailored and engaging interventions makes it a valuable complement to traditional mental health care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDigital HealthSame topicArt Therapy and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207