MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of electron irradiation on the structural and optical properties of crystalline Ge<sub>2</sub>Sb<sub>2</sub>Te<sub>5</sub> memory material: an experimental study

2025· article· W4415285551 on OpenAlexaff
Zulfiqar Ali, Furong Liu, Yinghao Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhase-change materials and chalcogenides
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIrradiationX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyRaman spectroscopyStructural stabilityElectron beam processingStructural changeElectron diffractionRaman scattering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study investigates the structural and optical responses of crystalline Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5 (GST), a key phase-change memory material, under electron irradiation in the energy range of 1-4 MeV. Structural and chemical modifications were analyzed by using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), while optical reflectivity was measured via UV-vis-NIR spectrophotometry. XRD results showed no major phase transition, suggesting structural stability of c-GST under irradiation. However, Raman and XPS analyses revealed notable sublattice-specific damage, particularly in the GeTe 4 units, indicating higher susceptibility of Ge-Te bonds compared to Te-Te and Sb-Te bonds. Structural reorganization and partial bond recovery were observed at higher irradiation energies. Optical reflectivity declined significantly at lower energies due to defect-induced scattering but partially recovered at 4 MeV, suggesting potential self-healing effects. These findings enhance understanding of irradiation tolerance in GST and underscore its viability for radiation-resistant phase-change memory applications, especially in harsh environments such as outer space.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicPhase-change materials and chalcogenidesFrench-language works237,207