MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415286165 · doi:10.1029/2024gc011930

Ice‐Rafted Detritus of the Southeast Grand Banks Slope, Newfoundland, Throughout Heinrich Layers 1 to 5a: 1. Petrology and Abundance

2025· article· en· W4415286165 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shettima Bukar, Frank Lisker, Tilo von Dobeneck, Lars Max, Y. Wang, Marlene M. Lenz, Stefan Mulitza, Guillaume St‐Onge

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
FundersPetroleum Technology Development FundDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsDetritusPleistoceneLithologySequence (biology)ConodontStadialDolomiteBrecciaAbundance (ecology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Late Pleistocene stratigraphic sequence of Heinrich event layers 1 to 5a shows a high petrological diversity with systematically varying abundances of specific ice‐rafted detritus (IRD) species. Our study core GeoB18530‐1 from the southeastern Grand Banks Slope of Newfoundland resolves these in continuity and considerable detail. Using digital light microscopy and thin section analysis, the compositional mineralogy of coarse‐grained IRD particles was photographically reproduced, petrographically examined, accurately described and named. From 8,243 identified particles, we established a new IRD classification scheme of 22 optically discernible prevalent IRD rock types and rock‐forming minerals. The abundance of each IRD species was counted at 2.3 cm resolution over the lower core section featuring six 30–50 cm thick Heinrich layers and similarly wide interlayers. This high‐resolution time series provides a complex geological record of the Laurentide Ice Sheet calving and episodic collapse during MIS 3 and MIS 2. The count statistics allow IRD species to be divided into three separate groups based on their equal, over‐, or under‐representation in Heinrich layers relative to their interlayers. Heinrich layers 1, 2, 4, and 5 were found to be petrologically similar, while Heinrich layers 3 and 5a have some deviating IRD constituents, conforming to previous findings. Ooid‐bearing dolomite IRD dominates the mid‐section of all Heinrich layers, whereas muscovite‐biotite granite IRD is enhanced at their tops and bottoms. The characteristic IRD lithology of the interlayers changes gradually over the investigated Late Wisconsinan Stage (60–15 ka).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemistry Geophysics GeosystemsSame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207