Intracortical microstructure profiling: a versatile method for indexing cortical lamination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intracortical microstructure profiling represents a powerful, scalable approach for investigating the laminar organisation of the human cortex on both in vivo and post-mortem datasets. Building upon a long tradition of histological analysis, this method leverages surface-based intracortical sampling to generate profiles of tissue properties across cortical depths. The present work outlines a standardised workflow for intracortical microstructural profiling, newly packaged as an open-source toolbox "CortPro" (https://github.com/caseypaquola/cortpro). Here, we explore the utility of central moments as descriptors of profile shape. Using these measures, we quantify (i) the extent to which in vivo MRI can capture laminar differentiation, (ii) the test-retest reliability of profiles, and (iii) their replicability across sites and studies. Our results demonstrate that intracortical profiles are remarkably robust and effectively mitigate bias-field related limitations of non-quantitative MRI. As applications of microstructure-sensitive imaging expand across development, aging, and disease, microstructure profiling provides a principled means of linking microstructural neuroanatomy with systems-level brain organisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".