MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415289842 · doi:10.21432/cjlt29118

Editorial Volume 51 Issue 2

2025· article· fr· W4415289842 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Martha Cleveland‐Innes

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Learning and Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Environments and Student Outcomes
Canadian institutionsAthabasca University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVolume (thermodynamics)Transformational leadershipContinuing educationHigher educationElectronic learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This journal has always supported research about learning, technology, and change. In the evolving landscape of education places and spaces, one truth is still emerging: learning is not confined to a traditional classroom or dictated by curriculum. It is shaped significantly by communities small and large, technologies of many types, and the beliefs and actions of those who teach and learn. Recent studies from Canada, France, Switzerland, and the United States offer a view to the continuing transformational change. Outlined are the problems, the promise, and the increasing complexity of techno-pedagogical reality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.521

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0110.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1560.112

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Learning and TechnologySame topicEducational Environments and Student OutcomesFrench-language works237,207