MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415293187 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2025.3622951

Ultrawideband Large Continuous Scanning NPRIM Leaky-Wave Antenna With Pole–Zero Cancellation-Based Suppressed Stopband

2025· article· W4415293187 on OpenAlexaff
Amine Mezghani, Ekram Hossain, Anirban Sarkar

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStopbandStub (electronics)MiniaturizationMicrostripMicrostrip antennaPatch antennaLeaky wave antennaAntenna (radio)Radiation pattern

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter presents a novel metamaterial-inclined negative/positive refractive index microstrip transmission line (NPRIM-TL) that transforms into a novel leaky-wave (LW) an tenna design with large angle continuous beam scanning function alities. The arrangement in essence features composite right/left handed (CRLH) properties exhibiting frequency scanning ca pability from −86° to +74° through broadside. Incorporating matching stub with the NPRIM-TL-based unit cell, an unique pole-zero cancellation technique is further realized to benchmark the complete suppression of open stopband. A nine unit cell antenna model is manufactured and experimentally validated as a proof of concept for seamless beam scanning throughout the X band. The proposed antenna supersedes the previous prototypes by offering miniaturization (1.9λ0), ultrawide-bandwidth (72%), optimum gain (13 dBi), low sidelobe level (< − 15 dB), and suppressed cross-polarization (< − 20 dB), highlighting its prac ticality for next generation wireless communication applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207