MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4415293676 · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcaf410

Comprehensive metabolomics profiling reveals novel biomarkers and pathways for early detection of Alzheimer’s disease

2025· article· en· W4415293676 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Prabhakar Tiwari, Anu Gupta, Meenakshi Kaushik, Anjali Yadav, Anjali Anjali, Rekha Dwivedi, Pallavi Mudgal, Yashwant Kumar, Manjari Tripathi, Rima Dada

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTranslational Health Science and Technology InstituteAll-India Institute of Medical Sciences
KeywordsDementiaMetabolomicsBiomarkerDiseaseCognitive declineNeurodegenerationReceiver operating characteristicAscorbic acid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Alzheimer’s disease is a multifactorial neurodegenerative disorder marked by cognitive decline, synaptic dysfunction, and metabolic alterations. This study investigated disease-associated profiles in the Indian population using integrated clinical, metabolomic, and plasma biomarker analyses. We enrolled 25 clinically diagnosed patients (mean age: 61.20 ± 7.76 years) and 25 cognitively healthy controls (mean age: 60.56 ± 7.48 years). Cognitive and neuropsychiatric assessments included Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III, Clinical Dementia Rating-Global, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for patients, and Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Clinical Dementia Rating-Global, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for controls. Plasma metabolomics was performed using liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, and targeted ELISA quantified amyloid beta 40, amyloid beta 42, phosphorylated tau181, phosphorylated tau217, neurofilament light chain, apolipoprotein E, APOE4, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, C-reactive protein, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and glutamate. Statistical analyses included principal component analysis, volcano plots, receiver operating characteristic curves, pathway enrichment, and correlation analyses. Patients showed reduced cognition (median Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-III: 26). Clinical Dementia Rating-Global scores (1.44 ± 0.65 versus 0.24 ± 0.25; P < 0.0001) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores (4.88 ± 4.21 versus 0.20 ± 0.50; P < 0.0001) were higher than controls. Principal component analysis revealed distinct metabolic clustering with 75 altered metabolites. Volcano analysis identified six upregulated (leucine, ascorbic acid, guanine) and 14 downregulated metabolites (valine, nicotinamide, octadecanedicarboxylic acid). Receiver operating characteristic curves highlighted octadecanedicarboxylic acid (AUC = 0.917), prolinamide (AUC = 0.908), 2-phosphoglycerate (AUC = 0.858), nicotinamide (AUC = 0.848), leucine (AUC = 0.768), and ascorbic acid (AUC = 0.748). Pathway enrichment indicated disruptions in branched-chain amino acid metabolism, nicotinamide metabolism, the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and neurotransmitter pathways. Biomarker analysis revealed elevated amyloid beta 40, amyloid beta 42/40 ratio, phosphorylated tau181, phosphorylated tau217, phosphorylated tau217/amyloid beta 42 ratio, neurofilament light chain, APOE4, C-reactive protein, and 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, with reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor (all P < 0.05). Significant correlations included eupatilin with phosphorylated tau217 and 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, glyceraldehyde with brain-derived neurotrophic factor, guanine with APOE4, and valine inversely with phosphorylated tau181. This study identifies distinct metabolic (octadecanedicarboxylic acid, prolinamide, leucine, ascorbic acid) and biomarker profiles (phosphorylated tau217, 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine, brain-derived neurotrophic factor) in Alzheimer’s disease. Disrupted pathways linked to neuroinflammation and oxidative stress support the potential for integrated early detection strategies. Despite the small cross-sectional cohort, findings highlight the need for longitudinal, multi-centric validation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrain CommunicationsSame topicMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesFrench-language works237,207