Can malnutrition, dietary habits, and diet quality be determinant factors in frailty, sarcopenia, low physical function, and depression in older adults?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The relationships between diet quality, malnutrition status and dietary intake and health problems such as frailty, sarcopenia, low physical function and depression, which are frequently observed in older individuals, are still unclear. This study aimed to investigate the associations between malnutrition, diet quality, and dietary intake and frailty, sarcopenia, low physical function, and depression in elderly individuals. METHODS: The Edmonton Frailty Scale (EFS), Sarcopenia Rapid Screening Test (SARC-F), Katz Activities of Daily Living Scale (KATZ) for the Elderly, Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)-Short Form, and Mediterranean Diet Adherence Scales (MEDAS) were administered to all study participants (n = 695) to determine frailty, sarcopenia, physical status, depression status, nutritional status and adherence to the Mediterranean diet. The participants' dietary acid load was assessed via the potential renal acid load (PRAL) and net endogenous acid production (NEAP) indicators. RESULTS: Compared with men, women had significantly greater levels of frailty and sarcopenia (p < 0.05). Frailty and sarcopenia status were correlated with each other, and GDS scores increased significantly, whereas KATZ scores decreased as their severity increased (p < 0.05). MNA and MEDAS scores correlated with EFS (r = -0.508, p < 0.001; r = -0.084, p = 0.027, respectively), SARC-F (r = -0.358, p < 0.001; r = -0.126; p = 0.001, respectively), and GDS (r = -0.397, p < 0.001, r = -0,243, p < 0,001, respectively), whereas KATZ and MNA (r = 0,439) scores were found to be positively correlated with energy (r = 0,133) and protein (r = 0,119) intake (p < 0,05). As the PRAL score increased, the GDS (r = -0.082; p = 0.031), the SARC-F (r = -0.087; p = 0.022), and the EFS (r = -119, p = 0.002) decreased significantly. Each 1-unit increase in the MNA score caused decreases of 0.857, 0.431, and 1.201 units in the EFS, SARC-F, and GDS, respectively, and an increase of 0.190 units in the KATZ. CONCLUSIONS: Malnutrition status is positively associated with frailty, sarcopenia, low physical activity, and depression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".