Brushstrokes of Revolution: Realism, Expressionism, and Romanticism in haipai Art
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article explores how haipai artists in Shanghai responded to the pressures of the Cultural Revolution (1966–1976), negotiating the demands of state-mandated revolutionary themes while striving to maintain their distinctive artistic traditions. Under the intense scrutiny of political authorities, artists such as Fang Shicong, Chen Yifei, and Cai Jiangbai blended realism, expressionism, and romanticism to create works that promoted socialist ideology and collective heroism. By analysing key paintings—including Fang’s Encounter on the Road and Da Qing Oil Workers, as well as the collaborative Wedding on the Execution Ground: As Long as the Principle is True by Chen Yifei and Cai Jiangbai—this study reveals how composition, colour, and symbolism were employed to reinforce political messages yet subtly preserve the hallmarks of the haipai style. The article contends that, while haipai artists fulfilled the propagandist aims of the Cultural Revolution, they also succeeded in sustaining Shanghai’s cosmopolitan artistic legacy, producing works that were both ideologically charged and aesthetically refined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".